Skip to content

Albums of 2009

For some reason, I feel it necessary to post a list of my favourite albums of last year, at least a month and a half after the rest of the world had completely lost interest in 2009. To be honest, I think now is a better time to be compiling a list like this than December would have been. There’s actually been time to properly digest the records that were released towards the end of the year and compare them more objectively with those from earlier months. So anyway, here are my top five albums of 2009:

5. Porcupine Tree – The Incident
I must admit I’m still digesting this one, so it’s possible it ought to be higher on the list. This certainly isn’t PT’s most accessible album, with disc 1 being a single 54-minute-long suite of music (although the not-quite-20-minute disc 2 is a much more approachable selection of four extra songs unrelated to the main concept). It’s ever so good, though.

4. Florence and the Machine – Lungs
I’ve mentioned this one already, and odds are you’ve heard at least some of it on a BBC trailer or on the radio or wherever. But as long as constant over-exposure hasn’t jaded you against it, this is a really good album.

3. Bat For Lashes – Two Suns
I fist heard the lead single from this album on the radio, which sparked my interest, and then I was again drawn to listen to more when saw her on Later… Each time I heard more of this record, it turned out not to be quite what I thought it would be, and generally it proved to be something better instead. And Natasha Khan’s voice is simply gorgeous, which is always a plus.

2. Jon Boden – Songs from the Floodplain
A concept album set after the apocalypse that follows flooding and oil shortages. It took me a few listens to get into this one, but it was well worth it. It’s folkier than Boden’s last album (the more indie-oriented Painted Lady), but it’s still quite different from his work with John Spiers and Bellowhead.

1. Heaven & Hell – The Devil You Know
No real surprises here; this album is largely what you’d expect from these guys in all respects bar one: how damn good it is. There can’t be many bands whose members have an average age of 59 rocking this damn hard. Regardless of the name it was released under, this is easily the best Black Sabbath album since The Mob Rules.

Honourable mentions:
Dream Theater – Black Clouds and Silver Linings
Slayer – World Painted Blood
Chickenfoot – Chickenfoot

Albums I probably would have liked if I’d got around to listening to them yet:
Skyclad – In the…All Together
Mastodon – Crack the Skye

Discriminatory Haircuts

On Tuesday, I had a haircut for the first time in nearly three years. And it got me thinking. How is it that hairdressers are allowed to price their services based on the gender of the customer?

Now, I can see how women’s haircuts would typically be more expensive than men’s. Women’s hairstyles are often more elaborate than men’s, and so require more work. But while more elaborate cuts do often cost extra on top of simpler ones, even the most basic cuts are priced differently for men and women. Had I been a woman, it would have cost over 50% more to get the exact same haircut as I did.

I can also see why, from a business perspective, a hairdresser would charge women more. Society still has a far greater expectation of vanity for women; there is far more expectation of women to look good and to appear well-groomed. Consequently a haircut is, for a lot of women, a more valuable and important service than it is for men. What puzzles me, though, is how it can be legal in the modern age to provide an identical service at differing prices depending on the gender of the customer.

Snobbery

A month ago, I bought the album Lungs, by Florence and the Machine. This was a bit of a gamble, as I hadn’t heard much of it beforehand (not knowingly at least), and was mostly going by what one or two other people had said about it. And as it turned out, this was a good move. It’s a really good album.

Which is why it pains me to see it advertised on television, to hear excerpts from it used in one in five trailers on the BBC, and to know that it’s been a huge mainstream pop hit. Every time I am reminded that this is music that everybody knows and, apparently, likes, I cringe a little with embarrassment to think that I, too, like this music.

But what’s more embarrassing is the knowledge that this reaction is, ultimately, stupid. Why should it matter who else likes a record? It makes no more sense to dismiss a record because it is popular than it would to dismiss it because it isn’t. Ultimately, the only real test of a record is to listen to it, and whenever I do that (as, indeed, I am doing at this very moment) I am reminded that Lungs is a superb album.

The absurdity of this reaction is further emphasised that lots of the music I enjoy has enjoyed huge mainstream popularity in other eras. Of the 25 best-selling albums of all time, I own numbers 2, 3, 4, 11, 13, 23, and 24* (not to mention several more further down the list). So when it comes to anti-mainstream elitism, I don’t really have any credibility anyway.

But while I’m aware of all of this, it doesn’t stop that little cringe of embarrassment. It just means that I then I feel a second instant of embarrassment for having been embarrassed the first time.

*Back in Black, The Dark Side of the Moon, Bat Out of Hell, Rumours, Led Zeppelin’s 4th album, Born in the U.S.A. and Brothers in Arms

AMTL

You may remember that back in July I announced that I was starting work on an Adeptus Mechanicus Titan Legion army for Epic. I decided to make this my entry for the ‘Tale of Epic Gamers 2009‘ painting challenge on Tactical Command, painting a certain amount each month (originally 500-1000 points, but after the first month I decided to up my target to 1000-1500 points) from August to December (I also did an extra month in January, but that wasn’t part of the challenge).

Six months on, and the army is finished. I now have an AMTL army worth a total of 9,000 points. And here it is:

AMTL Group shot

AMTL Group shot

AMTL Group shot

AMTL Group shot

The largest Titan in the army is the Imperator. I’ve shown a picture of this one here before, but I might as well include it again for the sake of completeness:

Imperator Titan

Next largest are the Warlords, of which I have two. The first is armed with the standard load-out of two Turbolaser Destructors, a Volcano Cannon and a Gatling Blaster:

Warlord Titan

The other carries a slightly more expensive load-out of a Support Missile, Turbolaser Destructor, Gatling Blaster and Laser Blaster:

Warlord Titan

Both of these are the old plastic ‘beetleback’ Warlord model. I decided to stick with old-school ‘Mars pattern’ titans for this army rather than mixing older and newer models to give the army a more unified look. I had considered trying to make an army entirely of ‘Lucius pattern’ models, but with Forge World discontinuing their Lucius pattern Reavers and Warhounds, and Mars pattern models being easier to track down second-hand, I decided to go with the older figures instead.

The Beetleback warlord model had four sockets on the top of its carapace. Two are for mounting weapons on, while the other two are for banner poles. However, I didn’t have enough banner poles (and wasn’t that keen on them anyway), so instead I covered the holes with turrets from Battlefleet Gothic cruisers:

Warlord Titan Rear

Next down in size are the Reaver Titans. In theory, these are supposed to be less numerous than the Warlords, but I have three times as many. There are a few reasons for this. One is that I love the model: it’s one of my all-time favourite Titan models. Another is that Mars pattern Reavers are easy to come by, since you can still get them new from Games Workshop. And thirdly, I found it much easier to come up with different weapons configurations for Reaver Titans that seemed to be worth the points than I did for the more-expensive Warlords. As before, the first of these titans is in the standard configuration of Missile Launcher and two Turbolaser Destructors:

Reaver Titan

The second uses the same weapons fit as Forge World’s Epic Reaver model; Missile Launcher, Gatling Blaster and Volcano Cannon:

Reaver Titan

A third is configured for a long-ranged heavy support role, carrying two Quake Cannons and equipped with a Carapace Landing Pad from which it can launch light skimmers to act as spotters for indirect fire:

Reaver Titan

The next titan is again carrying the same weapons fit as one of Forge World’s models, but this time it’s the same as their W40k model with a Missile Launcher, Gatling Blaster and Laser Blaster:

Reaver Titan

The last two are configured more for a close-range assault role. One has a Laser Burner, Plasma Cannon and Melta Cannon:

Reaver Titan

And the last has a Missile Launcher, Laser Blaster and Power Fist:

Reaver Titan

The smallest titans are the Warhounds. I have two packs of these, all equipped with the standard configuration of Plasma Blastgun and Vulcan Mega-bolter:

Warhound Titans

Warhound Titans

(For individual photos of the warhounds, see Warhound1, Warhound2, Warhound3, Warhound4.)

Three of the Warhound models I bought together and aside from being assembled into strange poses (easily rectified) were in good condition. The fourth, though, was in a bit of a state, with a dreadful, plastered-on paint job and visible blobs of glue around the joints (not to mention a fairly awful pose). So it was quite satisfying to strip, clean up and restore this model to a state where I was happy with it.

Finally, in addition to the titans themselves, I have two formations of Knights to support them. Note that one formation has spikes on the tops of the knights, while the other does not. That’s because on half of the models I had, at least one of the spikes had snapped off at some point, so I decided to remove all of the spikes from those for consistency.

Warhound Titans

Warhound Titans

As I mentioned before, this army comes to a total of 9,000 points, making it the largest Epic army I have. More exactly (using the Legio Gryphonicus army list, v.3.16):

Emperor Class Titan (Imperator) 1,250
Warlord Battle Titan
Turbolaser Destructor
Turbolaser Destructor
Volcano Cannon
Gatling Blaster
725
25
25
50
25
Warlord Battle Titan
Support Missile
Turbolaser Destructor
Laser Blaster
Gatling Blaster
Legate
725
75
25
50
25
50
Reaver Battle Titan
Apocalypse Rocket Launcher
Turbolaser Destructor
Turbolaser Destructor
575
25
25
25
Reaver Battle Titan
Apocalypse Rocket Launcher
Volcano Cannon
Gatling Blaster
575
25
50
25
Reaver Battle Titan
Carapace Landing Pad
Quake Cannon
Quake Cannon
575
(Free)
75
75
Reaver Battle Titan
Apocalypse Rocket Launcher
Laser Blaster
Gatling Blaster
575
25
50
25
Reaver Battle Titan
Laser Burner
Melta Cannon
Plasma Cannon
575
(Free)
50
25
Reaver Battle Titan
Apocalypse Rocket Launcher
Laser Blaster
Titan Close Combat Weapon
575
25
50
25
Warhound Scout Titan
Plasma Blastgun
Vulcan Mega-bolter
275
(Free)
(Free)
Warhound Scout Titan
Plasma Blastgun
Vulcan Mega-bolter
275
(Free)
(Free)
Warhound Scout Titan
Plasma Blastgun
Vulcan Mega-bolter
275
(Free)
(Free)
Warhound Scout Titan
Plasma Blastgun
Vulcan Mega-bolter
275
(Free)
(Free)
Forge Knights 400
Forge Knights 400
Total 9,000

At this point the army is essentially done. In principle, I’d quite like to add another two packs of Warhounds; one pair armed with with Plasma Blastguns and Turbolaser Destructors, and the other with Inferno guns and Vulcan Mega-bolters. This would bring the army up to a nice round 10,000 points. However, I’m in no hurry to do this, and I’m quite happy to call the army finished for the moment.

My next project for Epic will be some Imperial Navy forces. A fairly glaring omission from this army is any aircraft, and that’s because I’m currently planning to put together a wing of Imperial Navy aircraft that I can then use with any Imperial army I wish, in much the same way as I intend to share the standard configuration titans from this army with any Imperial Guard or Space Marine armies I assemble in the future.

Miniature scale

As I’ve mentioned in previous posts (and in other places, such as Farcebook), I have, of late, been painting several individual models simply as one-offs (or, at least, as part of only a loosely-connected group of models) rather than as part of any kind of army or gang for a particular game. So far, they’ve all been from Steve Buddle’s Spyglass miniatures (although generally they’ve been resin re-issues of old Spyglass sculpts from Spyglass’s successor Eolith rather than Spyglass originals), but I’ve got an order from Hasslefree Miniatures on the way as well. And I’ve really been enjoying it. Normally, when painting models for an army, you have to make compromises. Sure, that extra layer of highlights might seem like a good idea on this model, but if you do it for this one, you’ll have to do it for fifty other models, and then you’ll never finish the buggers. But with individuals, you can just keep going until you’re satisfied with the model, since the next figure you do will be different anyway.

Aside from these one-off figures, I’ve mostly been painting 6mm figures for Epic. And I’ve been having far more success painting up my Epic armies than I’ve ever had at painting any kind of army or other large force for gaming before.

And these two factors got me thinking about miniature scales. The more I think about it, the more I wonder whether 28mm isn’t the wrong scale for miniatures in general.

For armies, it’s arguably too big. Painting a 28mm figure well takes a few hours. Scale that up to fifty miniatures, and there’s a lot of effort involved. A lot of those fifty models are going to be fairly similar rank-and-file infantry, and while the first two or three of them may be exciting to paint, by the last few, they’re really getting tedious. To have any hope of getting a decent number of models painted, you have to compromise with a simplified paint-scheme. And fifty soldiers is barely an army anyway. That’s, what, two platoons? By contrast, in 6 or even 10mm, it’s easy to paint a batch of forty soldiers in a few hours. In a couple of months you can build up a real army. For wargames, 28mm is just too big to put together a reasonable sized force.

“Ah, but 6mm models are tiny,” I hear you cry. “There’s no satisfaction in painting a tiny little infantryman: I want my models to be works of art!” But once again, 28mm isn’t ideal.

Sure, there are lots of nice models at this scale. But if you’re just looking for models to paint to look nice, why not go for something bigger still? At 40mm, or the more popular 54mm, there’s so much more room for detail, so much less need to over-enlarge features to make them show up. More scope to add freehand details. More room for sculptors to get features right. Sure, you can get some great sculpts at 28mm, and do some lovely paint-jobs. But in every way that 28mm models are better than 6mm, so 54mm models are better still.

28mm is ultimately something of a compromise. But I’m beginning to wonder whether they don’t represent the worst of both worlds. Are they a happy medium between the demands of painter and gamer? Or are they just too big for gaming, but too small for display?

Adventuring party

In between Epic Titans, I have, for some variety, been occasionally painting up some more Spyglass/Eolith miniatures. They’re really nice models to paint, and that and the fact that they’re not part of an army so I can spend some extra time on each one individually has meant that they’re probably the best paint-jobs I’ve done. I’d painted up a couple, though, when I realised that with Shae, Kaylee and Barnaby, I’d painted up three quarters of a D&D group: a ranger, a sorceress and a cleric. All I needed was a ‘defender’ type character: a fighter, paladin or similar.

There were multiple candidates for this position. One possibility was the Spyglass Barbarian Warlord model, but he seemed too much like a ‘bad guy’ to fit. I also considered using ‘Tiriel’ from Hasslefree Miniatures, but decided I’d rather stick with Spyglass for this group. So I went with the Si’Rene model. She’s perhaps a little under-armoured for a fighter, but close enough.

Unfortunately, although I had used the same basing style for Kaylee and Barnaby (rough paving stones), I’d done Shae differently, so she didn’t quite fit. Fortunately, I had a spare version of the model that came as a pack with some others, so I came up with an alternative colour scheme and painted up another one.

So here they are as a group:

The Party

Here’s Kaylee, the sorceress. I decided to play up the heavy metal angle implied by the use of the corna gesture by using a lot of black in her clothing, although I didn’t want to over-do that so that she wouldn’t fit in a fantasy setting.

Kaylee

Next up is Barnaby, the monk. He’s more in the European monastic tradition than the oriental, so in D&D terms he’d be a cleric. Of all these models, this is the one I’m most pleased with, and I think he’s probably the best paint-job I’ve done.

Barnaby

Here’s Si’Rene, the fighter. As I mentioned before, she probably ought to be wearing a little more armour than this, but she’s close enough.

Si'Rene

And here’s the new version of Shae. I think she’s actually come out better than the other one. I think this is possibly because her face is a slightly different shape (probably as a result of being a resin cast rather than metal), and looks slightly better. I went for a more ‘urban’ colour scheme this time around, with greys and browns to blend in with wood and stone, rather than the predominantly green I used before. I think the flashes of red also give a vaguely autumnal feel.

Shae

Of course, since I don’t much like D&D as a game, and I’m not keen on using miniatures in RPGs (although in D&D, especially 4th edition, you need to have some sort of map system to handle combat), these models will probably never be used for gaming. But until half of them were done I was only ever intending to paint them for the fun of it anyway, so it doesn’t really matter. And it’s nice to have a theme to tie them together.

2010

So, it’s a new year. And indeed a new decade, unless you feel that the decades have to sync up perfectly with the centuries. I don’t. We don’t refer to decades as part of a sequence as we do with centuries (as in ‘the twenty-first century’), we refer to them in terms of the digits that identify them. Thus it doesn’t make any sense to consider, for example, 1980 as part of the 1970s.

On the subject of naming decades, we are no longer in the preposterously-named ‘noughties’. I remember thinking around about 1999-2000, when people were jokingly suggesting this name and thinking it was terribly amusing, that there was a real danger that the name would stick, and that by the end of the decade the joke would have worn very thin. Alas, I was right. Nobody seems to know what we’re going to call this new decade, though.

It remains to be seen whether we will now go back to referring to years as if they were a pair two-digit numbers rather than a single four-digit number. Personally, I don’t think that talking about two-thousand-and-whatever will get too unwieldy until 2021, but I suspect it might be better to go back to the old nomenclature sooner before we all get too used to the current one.

2009 has been a peculiar year. It’s certainly the shortest-seeming year I have had so far, largely because almost nothing has happened all year. My general situation is pretty much exactly the same as it was twelve months ago.

The new year got off to a good start. We saw out the old year with a barbecue, and much drinking. Clocktails were enjoyed, although this time around they were just randomly generated rather than being derived from the time. Some were very nice. Others less so. In the morning we had another barbecue for breakfast. Some might claim that barbecues are exclusively a summer activity. They are mistaken.

So here’s to the new year. Let’s hope it’s an improvement over the old one.

Weird

I learned in the pub this evening that there is a page on Encyclopaedia Dramatica dedicated to someone I have met in person.

In all honesty, it’s rather sad to see that since the last I heard of him several years ago, he not only hasn’t managed to pull himself together and sort himself out, but rather has managed to descend further into general failure and uselessness, going from just your average, common-or-garden failure at life to someone whose inadequacies are reportedly a legend of the Internet (albeit a very small and feeble one).

Christmas

So Christmas has been. It has not, however, gone. Christmas does not end until Epiphany on the sixth of January. But Christmas day is over, so I can at least do some reflecting on the subject.

I think one’s enjoyment of Christmas is very much dependent on one’s relationship with one’s family. It’s almost invariably a time of family get-togethers and as long as you and your family get along well, that’s great. If not, it’s going to be strained and difficult.

The build-up to Christmas, though is stressful for everyone. I’m not so jaded and miserable as to dislike Christmas once it’s actually in progress, but the build-up to it is an enterprise I could do very well without. I don’t even have to do much in preparation besides acquiring presents — no need to plan Christmas dinner for eight people or anything like that — but that’s tiresome enough. Especially the business of buying gifts for relatives you only see two or three times a year and hardly know well enough to know what is a good present anyway.

But for me, at least, once all that rubbish is sorted and Christmas is actually happening rather than just looming horrifyingly on the horizon, I still enjoy it. My mother has, over the past few years, fully mastered Christmas dinner, which has for a while been roast goose. And the business of exchanging presents is fun. Being the selfish, greedy, materialistic child in an adult’s body that I am, I enjoy receiving presents. But I enjoy giving them, too. It’s very nice to see someone open a present I got them and be pleased by it, especially if it was something I thought to get them rather than something they asked for.

Having had the Christmas experience at home yesterday, with my paternal grandparents and uncle, we’ll be enacting a similar ritual at my maternal uncle’s house in Somerset on Monday. In the meantime we have two days of quiet. After that, everything gradually starts drifting back to normal. I don’t know whether I’ll be doing anything in particular for this New Year. At this stage I’m inclined to suspect probably not.

Merry Christmas, everyone.

Eldar revisited

Having mostly been painting Imperial Titans over the last few months, I decided recently that it would make an interesting change to paint up an Eldar Titan. So along with the last Reaver Titan, I ordered a Phantom as well. It is now painted.

Phantom Titan

Having done that, I decided that while I was revisiting my Eldar army I might as well do some infantry as well, so I painted up this Guardian warhost:

Guardian Warhost

Having a third Guardian warhost means that I can now use all eight of my painted Wraithguard units rather than just the six. This conveniently brings the total number of points in this update to 1,000 exactly.

Group shot

When added to my existing Eldar army, this brings the total points cost up to 7,125 points under the current (2.5) version of the Alaitoc list, making the Eldar my largest painted army. However, I need paint only one more Imperial Titan before that overtakes it.

Incidentally, one thing that struck me was how tall the Phantom model is. It towers over its Imperial counterparts (aside from the Imperator, of course). Here’s a picture for comparison:

Titan height comparison

As you can see, even without the extra height added by the wings, it’s significantly taller than the Warlord, albeit thinner and less bulky.