<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Media Players</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.axelfendersson.co.uk/blog/2009/07/linux-media-players/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.axelfendersson.co.uk/blog/2009/07/linux-media-players/</link>
	<description>Mumbling of a demented squeezebox-player</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AxelFendersson</title>
		<link>http://www.axelfendersson.co.uk/blog/2009/07/linux-media-players/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>AxelFendersson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelfendersson.co.uk/wordpress/2009/07/linux-media-players/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>I have tried it. I seem to remember it looked promising, but had some way to go, although that was a little while back and it may have come on a bit since then. It also lacked the capability to turn off some of the unnecessary crap that needed turning off in Amarok to make it tolerable.

For audio, I&#039;m fairly pleased with Audacious so far. Now that the intrusive UI problems have been fixed it&#039;s pretty good: does the job without getting in the way. It&#039;s just for video that I&#039;m not sure what&#039;s the best way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried it. I seem to remember it looked promising, but had some way to go, although that was a little while back and it may have come on a bit since then. It also lacked the capability to turn off some of the unnecessary crap that needed turning off in Amarok to make it tolerable.</p>
<p>For audio, I&#8217;m fairly pleased with Audacious so far. Now that the intrusive UI problems have been fixed it&#8217;s pretty good: does the job without getting in the way. It&#8217;s just for video that I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s the best way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.axelfendersson.co.uk/blog/2009/07/linux-media-players/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelfendersson.co.uk/wordpress/2009/07/linux-media-players/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Have you tried this one: http://www.exaile.org/ at all? Exaile is GTK-based, Amarok-inspired, and written in Python. It&#039;s a pure audio player, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried this one: <a href="http://www.exaile.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.exaile.org/</a> at all? Exaile is GTK-based, Amarok-inspired, and written in Python. It&#8217;s a pure audio player, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

